Answers
Sep 29, 2021 - 02:59 PM
Hi,
I'm sure Emilie will jump in here soon, but I'm sure this is simply a typo - "on" should by "ont", the third-person plural auxiliary of pouvoir's past participle (pu). I'm often wrong, so best wait for Emilie's confirmation.
Sam
I'm sure Emilie will jump in here soon, but I'm sure this is simply a typo - "on" should by "ont", the third-person plural auxiliary of pouvoir's past participle (pu). I'm often wrong, so best wait for Emilie's confirmation.
Sam
Oct 06, 2021 - 07:43 AM
I actually caught this myself on June 17 of this year. Emilie replied on the 22 and confirmed that it was a typo. She also said they'd fix it ASAP - c'est possible qu'ils ont oublié?! ;)
Anyway, you can refer back to my question on the 17th to read Emilie's answer for yourself.
Cheers,
Brian
Anyway, you can refer back to my question on the 17th to read Emilie's answer for yourself.
Cheers,
Brian
Oct 13, 2021 - 07:07 AM
Yep, it's on my list for future updates which will be available soon! thx again!
Oct 13, 2021 - 08:46 AM
*Correcting my previous answer: it WAS on my list for future updates when it was reported to me the first time, so it has been fixed for a couple months now, you shouldn't see this error anymore so please let us know again where/if you still see this issue now. Many thanks!
