Answers
Aug 09, 2012 - 12:40 PM
Hmm, that's also the way it was presented in the 1+2 material, along with an explanation of it "flowing" better, which would would be true of 2 followed by 4, but not particularly true of 2 followed by 3. Perhaps it's a typo/speako. I'm only on lesson 2 of level 3, so haven't got there yet.